Pages

January 5, 2009

Random Reactions

On Blago and Burris: The US Senate declined to seat Roland Burris today. I completely concur. For someone who is currently a state wide office holder, the man displays a lack of political judgment of chasmic dimensions.

Doofus move #1. In a fit of greedy, self serving ambition, Burris accepts Blago's appointment to the senate seat vacated by Obama, demonstrating that in the service of his own ends, he is absolutely prone to throw good sense out the window and let someone play him for their own political goals. Who wants that in a senator? He willingly allows Blago to put him in the middle of this mess, neatly diverting the conversation away from Blago's failings to an irrevelant conversation about the fairness or not of seating him. The cherry on top of that? The nauseating display of the man's malleable situational ethics. A few weeks ago, he was calling for Blago's head along with the rest. Now, he has no opinion on the governor's troubles. He's all "Whats your governor got to do with me? I'm not trying to hear that see". Outrageous.

Doofus move #2: Co-siging on the ridicoulous race card playing of former Black Panther, now politically senile grey panther Bobby Rush, Burris goes on the cable shows to insinuate that a refusal to seat him would be an example of racially unfair treatment. The insanely idiotic racial irony of this soap opera of petty politics has my blood at high boil. Obama just won the presidency running from the land of Lincoln with a campaign that tried its very best to talk to America beyond Obama's skin color. Now here comes Burris, monkey signifying bout how they better let him come sit in the big Senate house, blatantly insinuating racial animus where none, zero, zilch, de nada, exists if he is not seated. Here the whole country is on a racial harmony high having elected a black president and what is Burris doing? Blatantly playing the race card to serve his own personal lust for power, position and prestige. Its not subtle, its not smart, it lacks integrity and it spits all over the historicity of the illinois senate seat from which Obama has made history. Epic buzz kill.

Burris does not deserve to be seated because he's demonstrated that he's venal, possesses situational, two faced ethics, still works with a 2oth century racial politics toolbox that has outlived its utility and is stupid enough to tarnish his own reputation by helping an obviuosly corrupt governor lay down political cover fire to suppress the well deserved scrutiny coming his way. The people of Illinois don't want this zero for a senator I am quite sure.

On Obama and Panetta: Leon Panetta to head the CIA? Huh? Last I checked, Panetta was a competent enough manager, but no spook. Nothing wrong with being a career politician if you're any good at it, but I don't like the idea of a guy who's never been a spook a day in his life, with no professional national security street cred to speak of leading the CIA. It totally smacks of a pander to the left who didn't want any body who smelled of the Jack Bauer tactics of the current administration in the slightest. I don't like it. Obama was doing a good job ticking off the left, and I would have preferred his CIA pick be an appropriately effective spook pro. Panetta's choice feels like reflexive political pandering to the idea that we have to play nice on national security, even though we live in a world where no one else does. I assume the CIA's job is to do the nation's dirty work in the dark and you hope that there is some moral speed governor in place. I don't mind Obama placating the left, but I'd prefer he not do it by appointing a non spook to head CIA

2 comments:

  1. While Burris is 1000% right that he has a legal claim to the seat (sorry, watched too much Maury over the holidays), given that the governor, despite the thick cloud surrounding him is still in power (as evidenced my his ability to schedule the special election for Emanuel's soon-to-be vacated seat), it doesn't pass the smell test-if you know Blago is 0.2 seconds away from a perp walk, why would you accept his phone calls, let alone an appointment?

    Second, I have a fundamental belief that every person of color is born with a deck of race cards-52 clear violations which you are duly appointed to slam down like the Big Joker in Spades (again, sorry, holiday reference) when it is warranted. Mr. Burris-this is NOT an appropriate use of one of your card, and we will allow you to put it back in your hand.

    Lastly, this circus lies squarely at the Dems feet-they got greedy and didn't want a special election 'cause they knew they'd lose, and really misjudged Blago: if the man was holding funding to a children's hospital hostage, who really thought he was going to do the honorable thing and walk away quietly? Show of hands? Anyone?!?!?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous3:24 PM

    Hey guys.

    I gotta say I'm pretty much in agreement with what Angela just said. I also agree with what you said about how the heck Burris could allow himself to be used as a Blago prop, and then hold up the race card as his shield. It's a disgusting mess, and that's all it is. Sometimes it's not enough just to have the law on your side.

    And other times, IQ translates to mean "In Question". Burris, this means you, pal.

    ReplyDelete

Speak and be heard.