January 5, 2012

Republicans Have Become Incapable of Discussing Race (UPDATED)


The day before the Iowa Caucus, Rick Santorum uses blacks to illustrate a point about government creating dependency in order to win votes.  The statement is on video and its pretty clear at least to me that its what he said. Here is the "cleaned up" version of the CBS video posted at HotAir.com which Ed Morrissey reviews and declares Santorum didn't say black peoples lives:



Santorum has now also said that he didn't actually say that. I think he's lying to the public and I think he's lying to himself.



When people like me reacted to Santorum's statement, conservatives rushed to his defense with the wildest of arguments: He didn't say it.  Its right there on the tape, but no, you didn't hear what you thought.  Its become the Rodney King video of presidential campaign politics. The denial is unreal. Here's how a commenter at NPR on the story explained it all away:

I worked on developing speech synthesis and speech recognition technology for a number of years and learned a lot about speech articulation and human perception. I am a Romney supporter but it is clear to me that Senator Santorum stumbled when attempting to say the phrase "peoples lives" so he paused after the first attempt and repeated the phrase "peoples lives". If you read his lips you can see that he mangled the first attempt to say the word 'people; and only the second half of the word people came out with part of the word 'lives' which is why he corrected himself. Since both the b sound and the p sound are made on the lips (the only difference is that the vocal cords "hum" with a b sound) the 'pl' sound when mangled sounded like a 'bl' sound. However if you listen to the recording and watch his lips he was not attempting to make an 'ack' sound but lots of listeners heard "black" because mentally they associate "black people" with public assistance. It was not Senator Santorum that was prejudicial, it was the listeners.

 Got that?  Its basically just in our minds.  Our brains, all of our brains, are just playing mental auditory tricks on us, making us hear our own prejudiced thoughts. Look at the extraordinary mental gymnastics going on in the above statement to negate what you clearly see and hear in the video.

As an aside, and a tip for others who need to defend themselves against a charge of prejudicial speech,  using as a defense all the great things you've done for black people is the wrong response.  If you have to tell all the great things you've done, you've already lost.  If Santorum were smart AND he truly had done some things in the black community that were beneficial, there would be a black person willing to say so.  You let them say all the good stuff you've done.  Just a little PR tip for free.

That Santorum would make a statement that suggests that blacks are largely on welfare and that welfare comes to us via money taken out of the pockets of white voters by government is not surprising, shocking or unusual.  That is a persistent meme on the right.  If I sat down with a Tea Party member or your average poster at Hot Air, they would would largely agree with that supposition.

What this episode really illustrates is how completely incapable of a principled discussion about race the GOP has become. Where does this denial come from? This refusal to face the issue and discuss it? Part of it is black folks fault. For years, we cried racism for so many things, sometimes deserved, sometimes not and we won the war.  White people think being a racist is evil and they are horrified to even have it suggested about them. Herein lies the problem now.  If you even suggest a critique of a policy or statement which alludes to a racial element, you are assumed to be making a charge of racism.  But because the terminology has been used so indiscriminately, we no longer have any shared understanding of what that means.  So now if you call someone a racist, or something milder such as suggesting that their behavior, words or opinion is motivated by race in some way, it is interpreted as an accusation that they are essentially akin to a Klansman and bear an irrational hatred to blacks.  Its like calling someone an evil caricature or cartoon.  And since most people are NOT Klansman, the accusation or critique is dismissed as though that's what you suggested.

Take Santorum.  He's obviously NOT a racist. But what he said in Iowa is clearly influenced by racially stereotypical ideas that are not grounded in the facts.  That is something that should be called out and discussed.  The issue isn't whether Santorum is a racist.  The issue is that his thinking has been shaped by faulty racial stereotypes and we should talk about that so that its surfaced and he can correct his thinking.

Conservatives however can never reach a discussion of the merits, because they are too busy defending themselves and saying that they are not evil Klansman.  They simply deny the charge, whatever it is, rather than engage the issue.  Now, it is simply become routine to adopt a posture that says any charge that suggests I'm influenced by racial stereotypes is defacto an accusation that I'm an evil racist and since that's obviously not true, I don't even have to make a principled response to your charge, I can just dismiss it. Its become an easy way to avoid having a real discussion about the memes regarding black people that are commonplace in the minds of conservatives.  That avoidance has rendered the GOP incapable of discussing the issue in any self critical way, to its detriment.



Comments (14)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I think you are right about this, but it is incomplete. It is a symbiotic relationship. Democrats have carefully maneuvered so that on any issue of race, Republicans are damned if they do and damned if they don't. The only solution to that game is to not play it.

Black people are disproportionately on welfare. Black people are six times as likely to be on welfare than white people. (There are nearly equal numbers of black and white people on welfare, but there are six times as many white people total. QED.) If Republicans try to address this issue, they are either:

trying to end welfare because they hate black people
or
trying to end welfare because they are pandering to white racists.

In other words, by just bringing it up, Democrats will accuse them of either actually being racist, or trying to get the racist vote. Democrats, on the other hand, can cite the exact same statistics, and it is held up as an indication of how concerned they are for black people and how much they are trying to help.

So, yeah, we know the script, and we are close to not caring anymore. When that happens, we are really in trouble, because it is a damned short hop from "I don't care if people call me racist" to "I don't care if I become racist."
My recent post Obama Violates Constitution
7 replies · active 689 weeks ago
Black people are disproportionately on welfare? Really? Only if you want to talk about welfare as WIC or public assistance payments, or put another way, only if you want to talk about forms of welfare where blacks are large beneficiaries. But if we're going to talk about welfare, then lets talk about welfare. Farm subsidies, corp. bailouts, Social Security. Those are all welfare, all breaking the bank, all costing FAR MORE than public assistance transfer payments that blacks receive and the beneficiaries of those welfare programs are overwhelmingly white, in raw numbers, proportionally or however you want to count it. Whenever this conversation about welfare is to be had, its curious that we only focus on welfare programs where blacks have large representation among the beneficiaries, never on the ones where they don't. But welfare is welfare.

Thats why the GOP is in a trick bag as you suggest on race and welfare, because they only want to focus on welfare where the beneficiaries are black. If conservatives and tea partiers were really consistent on this issue of dependency on government welfare, they would be equally as interested in pulling the beam out of their own eye as they are the splinter out of ours. The difference isn't lost on blacks and undermines conservatives who want to raise this as an issue because the inconsistency is so utterly glaring.
I'm with you. Means testing for SS would be a huge, huge step forward, much bigger than the welfare reform of Clinton. Bailouts and subsidies are all big targets of the Tea Party (of which Santorum is very much not a follower -- he's a social con. He's not a fiscal con by any means.)

Here's the problem. As soon as black people hear what they think are some sort of dog whistle, they immediately forget all the other things that have ever been said, and home in on that one statement like it is the entire platform. "Why are you focusing on us?" No one is. You are focusing on you.

Seriously. We have two times that Santorum has even brought up black people in the entire campaign, and black people are acting like that is some sort of indictment of the entire party. There's an irrational factor there.
My recent post Obama Violates Constitution
There's an irrational factor there? Really? Your argument would bear more weight if what we are describing were an isolated incident, but its not in any way. It's not just Santorum's "two times". You can go back through posts on this very blog and see the number of times I've called out insulting language and aspersions directed at black folks by GOP pols up and down the hierarchy of the party. This dog whistling behavior is COMMON. And it IS an indictment not only of the party, but the conservative movement itself that it is not confronted when it appears.

Conservative principles are better. The GOP's practice of them in implementation and messaging when it comes to engaging black folks is abysmal.
Point in fact on the Tea Party ending farm subsidies:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/...
Good on them, though I notice they don't go around insulting those beneficiaries as society draining laggards. Now, if they start going after dog whistle behavior emanating from their side of the aisle as consistently as they did those subsidies, I'll say nothing but nice things about them forever.
Wow, talk about missing the point. Asking the Tea Party to apologize for Santorum is like asking the NAACP to apologize for the Nation of Islam.
My recent post Obama Violates Constitution
Actually, I would expect the NAACP to call out BS from the Nation. That they fail to do so reflects poorly on them. So to with the Tea Party/GOP et al. When Santorum and Newt can make outrageous statements and get a pass or even worse be applauded and defended for them, that reflects poorly on the GOP/Tea Party and the principles they claim to support.

I take your point on the ethanol subsidies assuming the author of the article is correct in ascribing the impetus for letting them die to the Tea Party. I will note that farm subsidies are still very much a part of the agricultural industry landscape and you don't see Tea Party types opposing them by cosigning the same sorts of dog whistle rhetoric that gets pointed at blacks.
I appreciate you bringing this issue out. The instances of Republican presidential candidates saying ignorant things about race abound in this election cycle. Ron Santorum and Newt Gingrich are simply the latest in line.

As I've shared with you in the past ... it still confuses me that any person of African descent in America would actively support the Republican Party. Their leaders and their policies are simply not in synch with what Blacks in America need for success.

peace, Villager
My recent post Black Unemployment Rate Rises to 15.8% in December 2011
3 replies · active 689 weeks ago
And as I've said, if black people continue to react the same way, it confuses me why anyone thinks the Republican Party should waste resources trying to change black people's minds. You can't use reason to argue someone out of a position they weren't reasoned into.
My recent post Obama Violates Constitution
Wasting resources implies you actually expended some in the first place. That hasn't happened. And as I said, GOP dog whistle behavior is common, I document it often enough here and I'm not going looking for it, it finds me. You have a point that black folks largely tune out GOP policy positions after they hear one of those whistles, but you and I both know that the most voters are low information (its why neg attacks work). If GOP/Cons use insulting memes repeatedly on the black voting population, memes they already know are an issue, how are blacks to blame. As a movement, we don't go around insulting voting constituencies we actually think are important to our aspirations for government. The fact that we do it with blacks so routinely says volumes.
It shouldn't. Blacks were historically republican until the GOP through us under the bus. I think what should confuse you is why black folks demand so little accountability or real results from a party to which we have given unswerving political loyalty.

Democratic, progressive policies have not worked. Conservative principles are a better basis for policy that benefits us. The GOP's political practice leaves much to be desired, but so does the Democrats. Black folks have got to start playing their political cards better and stop being a democratic voting bloc by default.
I know you wrote this a long time ago, but just wanted to say thanks so much for publishing this. I'm fairly young and though I am biracial, I look white, and I've been thinking a lot about race and the charges of racism lately. I think you really hit the nail on the head. To me, what Santorum said makes him - as you pointed out - *prejudiced*, not *racist.* The way I see it, racism is a lifestyle of hatred, whereas prejudice is borne out of culture and lack of experience with other ethnicities.
1 reply · active 625 weeks ago
Written yesterday or two years ago, no matter, I welcome responses to posts anytime, its the whole idea. I've got a son who is very fair skinned and though I don't think he could actually pass as white, I think his fair skinned appearance will affect how people view him. I think your assessment of Santorum as prejudiced is fair and since the reality is that all of us are prejudiced in some way when it comes to race and ethnicity (and lots of other things), I'm not sure its really a controversial thing to say. Thanks for weighing.

Post a new comment

Comments by